Lifting Operation
CompletedReference: RA-2026-wThQ7C45
Total Activities
4
High Risk
4
Medium Risk
0
Low Risk
0
📄 Method Statement
No method statement was uploaded for this assessment.
Risk Assessment Matrix
| SN | Activity | Hazard | Consequence | Groups Exposed | Controls | Initial Risk | Additional Controls | Residual Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mobilization and transit of heavy mobile telescopic cranes to construction site | - Overturning on public roads or internal haul roads - Collision with third-party light vehicles and pedestrian traffic - Overhead contact with live overhead utility lines - Structural bridge collapse due to exceeding axle weight limits - Brake fade or mechanical steering failure on inclined approach ramps | - Multiple fatalities or permanent catastrophic disabilities - Severe structural damage to public and site infrastructure - Prolonged vehicular blockage and civil liability claims - Hazardous fluid spillage into public storm drainage | Crane Operator, Escort Vehicle Drivers, Site Logistics Marshals, General Road Users | - Conduct Route Survey Assessment prior to dispatch specifying road load capacities - Secure transportation permits from local transport authorities (e.g., DOT, RTA, ADM) - Provide certified escort vehicle with amber flashing beacon trailing at 30m distance - Strictly observe designated maximum haul road speed limit of 15 km/h on site - Verify driver possesses valid heavy articulated vehicle license and defensive driving certification - Deploy banksman with high-visibility vest at site entry access gates - Confirm clear overhead clearance of at least 1.5m above crane boom travel profile |
P
4
×
S
5
20
|
- Implement real-time GPS tracking and driver telematics to monitor speed violations - Restrict crane movement strictly to off-peak road hours (22:00 to 05:00) - Require mandatory pre-dispatch mechanical brake and tire pressure audit checklist - Comply with ISO 45001:2018 – Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems - Comply with ILO Convention C155 – Occupational Safety and Health |
P
2
×
S
3
6
|
| 2 | Ground condition assessment, soil compaction testing, and outrigger pad civil verification | - Punching shear failure of crane outrigger foot through soft soil - Setting up over hidden underground voids, drainage culverts, or live utilities - Uneven ground settlement leading to crane out-of-level tilt - Soil wash-out or embankment slope failure caused by rain or dewatering - Insufficient outrigger mat surface contact area | - Catastrophic crane tip-over and structural boom collapse - Crushing injuries and fatalities of surrounding workers - Major utility pipeline rupture and site-wide flooding - Severe asset damage exceeding crane total loss | Lifting Engineer, Geotechnical Surveyor, Crane Operator, Lifting Supervisor | - Obtain geotechnical Plate Load Test / California Bearing Ratio (CBR) report prior to setup - Maintain minimum safety clearance of 1.5 times trench depth from edge of un-shored excavations - Mandate structural engineer sign-off on allowable bearing capacity (minimum 200 kPa) - Use certified steel spreader mats or engineered hardwood timbers sized via outrigger load calculations - Locate all buried utilities using Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) and obtain excavation clearance permits - Ensure crane level indicator (spirit bubble) confirms 0.0-degree deviation - Inspect ground integrity daily before and after heavy rainfall or high-tide shifts |
P
4
×
S
5
20
|
- Install automated settlement monitoring pins around the crane base perimeter - Require Appointed Person (Lifting) to formally inspect and sign the Crane Pad Handover Certificate - Mandate re-verification of compaction following any nearby civil trenching activities - Comply with ISO 45001:2018 – Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems - Comply with ILO Convention C155 – Occupational Safety and Health |
P
2
×
S
3
6
|
| 3 | Deployment and fully extended leveling of hydraulic crane outriggers and stabilizers | - Crushing of fingers and hands during mechanical outrigger extension - Structural failure of internal hydraulic stabilizer rams or check-valves - Incomplete extension of outrigger beams contrary to duty chart settings - Slippage of outrigger float from non-level or contaminated spreader plates - Outrigger sinking during hydraulic pressure transfer | - Traumatic amputation of rigger digits - Sudden crane tilting during load pickup - Total structural failure of crane chassis - Fatal crush injury against nearby fixed structures | Rigging Crew, Mobile Crane Operator, Banksman, Mechanics | - Verify 100% full extension of all outrigger beams unless load chart explicitly supports intermediate mode - Ensure mechanical safety locking pins are fully engaged on all outrigger slider beams - Position crane floats squarely in the center of timber/steel outrigger mats - Elevate crane wheels completely off the ground to clear tires of all load bearing - Verify operational integrity of hydraulic pilot-operated check valves prior to set-up - Maintain visual contact between Crane Operator and Rigger during cylinder stroke - Keep hands clear of pinch zones marked with hazard warning stripes |
P
4
×
S
4
16
|
- Install proximity warning alarms or interlock sensors confirming outrigger deployment - Conduct daily visual leak audit of all outrigger hydraulic hoses and fittings - Prohibit crane operations if any single outrigger shoe is not fully planar to the mat - Comply with ISO 45001:2018 – Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems - Comply with ILO Convention C155 – Occupational Safety and Health |
P
2
×
S
2
4
|
| 4 | Tower crane foundation structural inspection, anchor stool embedment, and torque verification | - Anchor bolt failure due to insufficient concrete cure strength - Anchor stool bolt shearing caused by improper torque tightening - Sub-base structural cracking or shear deflection under cyclic dynamic loading - Moisture ingress leading to corrosion and fatigue failure of fixing studs - Omission of high-tensile locking washers or double-nut locking mechanisms | - Sudden catastrophic tower crane collapse - Multiple workplace and public fatalities - Total destruction of adjacent multi-story buildings - Substantial financial insolvency and legal prosecution | Structural Inspector, Tower Crane Erection Technicians, Site Engineers | - Mandate concrete cube test certification confirming 100% specified design compressive strength (e.g., 40 MPa) - Use calibrated hydraulic torque wrench to tighten anchor bolts to OEM specified values - Perform Non-Destructive Testing (NDT/Ultrasonic) on 100% of embedded anchor stools - Obtain Third-Party Structural Engineer Foundation Sign-off Certificate before assembly - Apply heavy-duty anti-corrosive grease and protective caps over exposed anchor threads - Install earth-pit bonding achieving electrical grounding resistance under 10 Ohms - Re-torque all foundation bolts within 100 operational crane hours post-commissioning |
P
3
×
S
5
15
|
- Implement weekly precision surveyor monitoring for tower plumbness (max allowable 1:1000) - Require OEM technician sign-off prior to handing over the anchor base for erection - Fit vibration telemetry sensors on tower stool to detect dynamic cyclic displacement - Comply with ISO 45001:2018 – Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems - Comply with ILO Convention C155 – Occupational Safety and Health |
P
1
×
S
3
3
|
Likelihood / Frequency
| Descriptor | Likely Frequency | Probability |
|---|---|---|
| Frequent | Occurs frequently | 5 |
| Often | Occurs several times per year | 4 |
| Likely | Has occurred more than once | 3 |
| Possible | Has occurred | 2 |
| Rare | Never occurred | 1 |
Risk Matrix — Probability × Consequence
| Probability | Consequence | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Insignificant (1) | Minor (2) | Moderate (3) | Major (4) | Catastrophic (5) | |
| Rare (1) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| Possible (2) | 2 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 10 |
| Likely (3) | 3 | 6 | 9 | 12 | 15 |
| Often (4) | 4 | 8 | 12 | 16 | 20 |
| Frequent / Almost Certain (5) | 5 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 25 |
| 15 – 25 | Extreme Risk | Activity or industry should not proceed in current form. |
| 8 – 12 | High Risk | Activity or industry should be modified to include remedial planning and action and be subject to detailed EHS assessment. |
| 4 – 6 | Moderate Risk | Activity or industry can operate subject to management and/or modification. |
| 1 – 3 | Low Risk | No action required, unless escalation of risk is possible. |
Activity Log
System
•
created
4 weeks ago